Like-for-like, across clouds
Compare
The same thing, priced by each vendor, on one unit that means the same to all of them. Every figure names the SKUs it was built from and links to them, so you can check the arithmetic rather than take it on trust.
Why these prices can be compared at all
Vendors do not sell the same shape. Google prices a machine's cores and its memory separately; AWS prices the whole instance. So a like-for-like figure is composed — four cores plus sixteen gigabytes on one side, the instance type whose spec is four cores and sixteen gigabytes on the other. Where both vendors publish the same unit already, such as a gigabyte-month of object storage, the comparison is direct. Every result is scoped to one region group and one pricing model, so a committed rate is never held up against an on-demand one.
What are you buying?
Compute
Databases
Storage
Networking
Not enough to compare here
Only AWS publishes something that qualifies for this combination in Europe on on-demand pricing. A one-sided chart is not a comparison, so there isn't one.
How each number was built
The cheapest qualifying configuration per cloud, and the SKUs it is made of
- AWSgp3$0.0880per GB-month
Components of the aws price $0.088 per GB-month of General Purpose (gp3) provisioned storage - EU (Ireland) unchanged — $0.0880/GB-Mo Cheapest of 12 configurations that qualified · median $0.1285 per GB-month
No qualifying configuration from Google Cloud under these pivots. Absent, not zero.
Where it is cheapest
Same configuration on on-demand pricing, by geography
| Region | AWS |
|---|---|
| United States & Canada | $0.0800 |
| Europe | $0.0880 |
| Asia Pacific | $0.0912 |
| South America | $0.1520 |