Skip to content
Get alerts

Like-for-like, across clouds

Compare

The same thing, priced by each vendor, on one unit that means the same to all of them. Every figure names the SKUs it was built from and links to them, so you can check the arithmetic rather than take it on trust.
Why these prices can be compared at all
Vendors do not sell the same shape. Google prices a machine's cores and its memory separately; AWS prices the whole instance. So a like-for-like figure is composed — four cores plus sixteen gigabytes on one side, the instance type whose spec is four cores and sixteen gigabytes on the other. Where both vendors publish the same unit already, such as a gigabyte-month of object storage, the comparison is direct. Every result is scoped to one region group and one pricing model, so a committed rate is never held up against an on-demand one.

Not enough to compare here

Only Google Cloud publishes something that qualifies for this combination at 8 vCPU · 64 GB in APAC on on-demand pricing. A one-sided chart is not a comparison, so there isn't one.

How each number was built

The cheapest qualifying configuration per cloud, and the SKUs it is made of

No qualifying configuration from AWS under these pivots. Absent, not zero.

Where it is cheapest

Same configuration on on-demand pricing, by geography

Cheapest price per vendor for each region, in per hour.
RegionGoogle Cloud
United States & Canada$0.3461
Europe$0.3634
Asia Pacific$0.3233
South America$0.4949
Middle East & Africa$0.3807

What a commitment is worth

Same configuration in APAC, by pricing model

Cheapest price per vendor for each pricing model, in per hour.
Pricing modelGoogle Cloud
On-demand$0.3233
Committed$0.212434%

No commitment. The rate everyone can get, and the only one that compares cleanly.