Skip to content
Get alerts

Like-for-like, across clouds

Compare

A list price is not a measurement until you say what it measures. Every number here is normalised onto one stated unit before anything is compared — and every number shows the SKUs it was built from, so you can check the working rather than take it on faith.
Why these prices can be compared at all
Vendors do not sell the same shape. Google prices a machine's cores and its memory separately; AWS prices the whole instance. So a like-for-like figure is composed — four cores plus sixteen gigabytes on one side, the instance type whose spec is four cores and sixteen gigabytes on the other. Where both vendors publish the same unit already, such as a gigabyte-month of object storage, the comparison is direct. Every result is scoped to one region group and one pricing model, so a committed rate is never held up against an on-demand one.

Not enough to compare here

Only Google Cloud publishes something that qualifies for this combination at 4 vCPU · 16 GB in APAC on on-demand pricing. A one-sided chart is not a comparison, so there isn't one.

How each number was built

The cheapest qualifying configuration per cloud, and the SKUs it is made of

No qualifying configuration from AWS under these pivots. Absent, not zero.

Where it is cheapest

Same configuration on on-demand pricing, by geography

Cheapest price per vendor for each region, in per hour.
RegionGoogle Cloud
United States & Canada$0.1375
Europe$0.1444
Asia Pacific$0.1199
South America$0.1966
Middle East & Africa$0.1513

What a commitment is worth

Same configuration in APAC, by pricing model

Cheapest price per vendor for each pricing model, in per hour.
Pricing modelGoogle Cloud
On-demand$0.1199
Committed$0.078734%

No commitment. The rate everyone can get, and the only one that compares cleanly.